<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jetting off to global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://westnorth.com/2006/06/16/jetting-off-to-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://westnorth.com/2006/06/16/jetting-off-to-global-warming/</link>
	<description>an irregular view on cities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://westnorth.com/2006/06/16/jetting-off-to-global-warming/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paytonc.wordpress.com/2006/06/16/jetting-off-to-global-warming/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>The explosive growth of air travel, especially in countries like China and India, is certainly disconcerting on the environmental front.  But I do think that there are promising developments on the horizon... for example, the forthcoming Boeing is estimated at 20% more fuel efficient than existing models of the same class, which is not insignificant.  And considering how long it takes to develop and manufacture a new airplane, this is based on the technologies of the late 90&#039;s, early 00&#039;s.  Other advancements, particularly with bleedless engines and composite material engineering should yield serious improvements.

As well, we&#039;re in the midst of a big turnover period as airlines phase out the 80&#039;s workhorses and modernize their fleets.  This has been going on for many years, but the economic squeeze has created a new urgency and I think most airlines are making better choices for it.

But the proliferation of low-cost-carriers and regional jet travel are really mixed bags, indeed.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s only going to get worse, but perhaps all the competition will help spur advancement and improvement.

I write this, incidentally, two minutes walk from the imposing Death Star of a building, which is home to the Kyoto Protocol.  And we don&#039;t have an airport here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explosive growth of air travel, especially in countries like China and India, is certainly disconcerting on the environmental front.  But I do think that there are promising developments on the horizon&#8230; for example, the forthcoming Boeing is estimated at 20% more fuel efficient than existing models of the same class, which is not insignificant.  And considering how long it takes to develop and manufacture a new airplane, this is based on the technologies of the late 90&#8242;s, early 00&#8242;s.  Other advancements, particularly with bleedless engines and composite material engineering should yield serious improvements.</p>
<p>As well, we&#8217;re in the midst of a big turnover period as airlines phase out the 80&#8242;s workhorses and modernize their fleets.  This has been going on for many years, but the economic squeeze has created a new urgency and I think most airlines are making better choices for it.</p>
<p>But the proliferation of low-cost-carriers and regional jet travel are really mixed bags, indeed.  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s only going to get worse, but perhaps all the competition will help spur advancement and improvement.</p>
<p>I write this, incidentally, two minutes walk from the imposing Death Star of a building, which is home to the Kyoto Protocol.  And we don&#8217;t have an airport here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
