Best MC ever

by

Deleted from Craigslist, but saved for posterity by Wonkette: Senate Hearing on [Federal] Marriage Amendment (6/22/2004) — m4m — 25

(and yes, public space. if not for public spaces, we wouldn’t be having missed connections, would we?)

Government takes and gives

by

[New York City] Council Member David Yassky (D-Brooklyn) has introduced a bill that would make inclusionary zoning mandatory. He is unequivocal in his thinking. �When there is a change from manufacturing to residential, property values increase 500 or 600 percent. When you have that kind of wealth created by a government action, it is only fair to use some of it for the public good. The Department of City Planning came to Brooklyn and told the residents there would be affordable housing in new developments. If they really intend to keep their promise, then they should have no problem putting it into writing and guaranteeing that it will be done.�

Planners Network, Spring 2004

Inclusionary zoning is usually a good idea, but planning for public benefits is most appropriate — indeed, most necessary — in instances where government “gives” substantial windfall profits to the private sector. Upzoning in a deindustrializing city like New York, as has been done in Vancouver, provides a great opportunity to extract tremendous concessions from developers: new parks, schools, affordable housing, community facilities, and transit should top the list.

Heading for the border

by

At the Highway 15 border crossing, from Blaine to Surrey. The guy directing traffic sent me to the empty “pass holder” lane, past the long lines of cars and trucks. Instead of parking and walking in, I rode up to a window.

RCMP border crossing agent [strong jaw, red hair]: Where are you from?
Me: Chicago, Illinois.
RCMP: Did you bicycle all the way from Chicago?
Me: No, I came from Seattle…
RCMP: And what do you do in Chicago?
Me: I’m an urban planner.
RCMP: Is that why you’ve cycled from Seattle instead of driving?

Photos of Seattle, Bellingham, Vancouver, and Victoria (and some of the countryside in between) coming when I get back.

$3.2M teardown!

by

“Charles Besser, a man with lots of money to strike a small blow against multitudinous multi-family-ism,” has purchased a 16-unit apartment building on Dearborn in the Gold Coast and plans to build a single-family house there. Never mind that, less than ten years ago, he tore down a four-flat to build his current house.

S-T columnist David Roeder makes some more snide remarks about how useless, unloved, and passe multifamily housing is:

Single-family living is under attack from the right, the developers who want to stack people like pancakes, and the left, dewy-eyed planners who think the stacking preserves precious resources.

Well then, I guess we have our coalition cut out for us.

Again, let’s reiterate that gentrification is economic growth combined with population decline. Deconversion and much larger living spaces result in fewer residents, except when there’s plentiful new construction.

Apathy strikes

by

Just 17% of 22-year-old men in Chicago voted in the spring primary, compared with 55% of 66-year-old women. C’mon guys — can’t we do better than that? [Source: Trib]

Ah, and I’ll be traveling in lovely Cascadia over the next week. My bike’s already on its way across the Great Plains (via Amtrak, which turns out to be a great way to ship things across the country at little cost — and which involves descending into the bowels of Union Station), and I’ll join it on Thursday in Seattle.

Canadian nice

by

“Mr. Martin [Liberal party leader] has tried to raise fears in his [negative] advertising campaign that Mr. Harper [Conservative party leader] has ‘a secret agenda’ to move the country far to the right. In one commercial, a female narrator warns that Mr. Harper would have sent troops to Iraq, and that he would resurrect a divisive abortion debate, weaken gun control and reverse Canada’s signing of the Kyoto climate control accord.”

Nowhere in the US, except perhaps the Bay Area, could anyone get away with such advertising.

CNU events this week

by

Tooting my own horn, of course, but I really am excited about the conference. However it means that I won’t be blogging and probably hard to reach this week.

The twelfth Congress for the New Urbanism is rolling into town this week, and even if you can’t register for the whole shebang or aren’t a member of CNU (although you should join), there are many events that Chicagoans who care about walkable, diverse communities should consider attending:

WEDNESDAY, 6/23
– The Coalition to Lower Obesity in Chicago’s Children presents Environmental Barriers to a Healthy Lifestyle
This one-day conference will explore community-level barriers to good nutrition and physical activity, and local efforts to confront the obesity epidemic. Speakers include Katherine Kraft and Rich McClintock. information and free registration

– First Congress of the Next Generation of the New Urbanism
For one day, a group of students, young professionals, academics and practitioners will gather to discuss the future of the New Urbanism. registration

– Next Generation after-party
Join the Next Generation for an evening event following the first NGNU Congress. Cash bar. 9pm, Handlebar, 2311 W. North Ave.

THURSDAY, 6/24
– New Urbanism 101
This in-depth program is open to anyone getting a first taste of New
Urbanism. Sessions on the movement’s history and principles will be
supplemented by segments on the link between public health and urban design,
green urbanism, and a panel discussion on new urbanist retailing.
Registration includes admission to the Thursday evening opening session. information / registration

– New Urbanism 202
Professionals are invited to these advanced seminars with expert new urbanist practitioners. Choose from six sessions:
1. Financing New Urbanism
2. Real Streets: Designing, Getting and Keeping Them
3. Transit-Oriented Development: Making it Work in the Marketplace
4.Top Techniques for Successful Charrettes
5. Mixed-Use Town Centers: Tenant Selection, Programming, Planning and
Design
6. Developing the New Urbanism
information / registration

– Tours
Twelve tours, guided by knowledgeable local tour guides, offer urbanists a behind the scenes look at Chicago — from Lake Forest to Lawndale, from a mile-long walk through Wicker Park to a 40-mile circuit around Chicago. (I will be giving tours C and K.) information / registration

SATURDAY, 6/26
– Charter Awards luncheon
Join our mid-day celebration for the winners of CNU’s 2004 Charter Awards. The awards recognize exemplary projects that advance New Urbanism though diverse land uses, innovative designs, and expert planning, at all three scales of the Charter of the New Urbanism: building, neighbohood, and region. [more info /
registration]

– Saturday Night Party
Sustainable human environments include laughter, dinner, dancing, and fireworks! Join us on Navy Pier for a gala evening set against unforgettable lake and skyline views, including a special show from Second City. [more info / registration]

Exciting zoning!

by

This year’s Congress will include a number of sessions explicitly about coding. Zoning codes have long fascinated new urbanists, especially in their power to set bad planning decisions into stone, but now we’re getting around to actually implementing some really great alternatives to the usual zoning regs. It’s an exciting time for zoning all around the country, and naturally many of the best innovations are covered in a new title from CNU, Codifying New Urbanism (PAS report 526, available soon from the CNU Store).

The usual argument behind deregulating uses and regulating forms hasn’t changed: people in urban environments expect some messiness and diversity of use, and besides, many uses (even light manufacturing) aren’t as repugnant as they might have been prior to deindustrialization. Plus, market forces do a better job of keeping heavy industry out of comparatively higher-value residential or commercial areas than even zoning ordinances do. On the other hand, providing strong directives on the form of building allows new development to take on predictable shapes — something which people genuinely appreciate, from the neighbors whose yards will be shaded to the passerby who know that the buildings will reinforce the scale of the street. The old 1910s and 1920s zoning laws read and look like today’s form-based ordinances, with their emphasis on illustrations showing particular building envelopes and lack of references to required loading docks or efficiency apartments.

One term I’m particularly fond of, but which other new urbanists haven’t seemed to notice, is dezoning — loosely form-based, incentive-driven, largely use-neutral codes written by Mark Hinshaw of LMN Architects in Seattle. The Bainbridge Island and downtown Tacoma codes are sublimely straightforward; the Tacoma ordinance, in particular, offers a sensible menu of easily understood bonuses to encourage quality development: separate FAR buckets for commercial and residential encourage residential construction, submitting to design review tacks on a few extra FAR points, a short menu of sensible pedestrian-friendly amenities gets a few more.

APA this year included a workshop on form-based coding that, by all reports, provided a good overview of the rapidly growing number of form-based codes nationwide.

One very early example in the “Codifying” book that I was dimly aware of before is Christopher Alexander’s City of Gardens apartment house zoning for Pasadena. In Edge City, Alexander (presented by author Garreau as a thoughtful and spot-on, if kooky, character) described how the zoning ordinance sought to place gardens before buildings and therefore make the new apartment houses beautiful enough to insert into single family neighborhoods. The code mandates usable, beautiful open spaces instead of mindlessly requiring front, rear, or side setbacks that too often end up as wasted space — even if the result is watered-down, as Alexander complains to Garreau. I, for one, love living in a courtyard building with negligible front, side, or rear setbacks, since it means that we all get to enjoy a lovely courtyard in the center (and at 60 dua, natch!).

One not very exciting new ordinance, unfortunately (but naturally, given City Hall’s bias towards stasis), is Chicago’s new ordinance. Sure, a few concessions to the ZTEC organizing work were tossed in, but c’mon — can’t you at least re-number the R districts instead of assigning them “X.5” designations?

an update

by

I’ve been fairly scarce lately, both here and everywhere else. I have a good reason — work is reaching a fever pitch as we prepare for CNU XII, where more than 1,300 urbanists from around the world will gather in Chicago to learn about and talk about the state of the art in new urbanism. It’s all very exciting, but it’s all so much work.

I’ll take a week of vacation in Seattle and Vancouver in the first part of July, and then maybe a little more vacation to ride around northern Illinois or to visit Montr�al. Once that’s all done, there will be exciting new projects to tackle at work (on public housing, green building, rating urbanism, street design, and other emerging CNU projects) and on other fronts — canvassing for the Bloomingdale Trail, the string ensemble, the possible housing co-op (which might involve moving back to the south side and thus changing many political allegiances), etc. So it’s good to be busy.

New Wrigley plans filed

by

The Cubs have once again filed plans to fill in one of the most egregious holes in the urban fabric, the block-long car wash/parking lot wasteland immediately to the west of Wrigley Field. Yes, ownership of the Seminary railroad ROW is still under litigation between the city and the Cubs, but the proposal would largely re-open it as a pedestrian walkway.

I’d be curious to know exactly how the land just west of Wrigley ever got to be such a wasteland, especially when Clark Street to the north and south are largely intact and when there’s obviously such strong market demand for pedestrian oriented retail, entertainment, and housing (oh, and parking) in the area. It may have to do with the old Lakewood-Seminary railroad (see map — the diagonal approaching from the SSW), but that’s been filled in with largely contextual residential to the south. Right at Addison and Clark, fast food restaurants have occupied the old ROW and adjacent parcels since anyone can remember.

Parking, even when structured into flatiron buildings that provide urban form and ground-level retail (as the Cubs and Philip Bess have proposed), may not be a suitable use for the neighborhood already wracked by road rage inducing traffic congestion on a daily basis. A thousand more cars may pay very profitable rents indeed, but Lakeview’s roads just couldn’t handle the additional load. The Cubs would be better off with the team-support and office uses above ground, with parking still provided off site (or not at all).